Uncategorized

WIFE CAN SEEK MAINTAINANCE U/S 125 CrPC, WHO CHALLENGED THE DIVORCE DECREE AND DENIED PERMANENT ALIMONY

Wife Can Seek Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC If She Has Challenged Divorce Decree And Hasn’t Accepted Permanent Alimony Under Section 25 Hindu Marriage Act. Despite the Family Court’s grant of a divorce order, the Allahabad High Court recently awarded a wife’s claim for maintenance under Section 125 of the CrPC, noting that an appeal …

WIFE CAN SEEK MAINTAINANCE U/S 125 CrPC, WHO CHALLENGED THE DIVORCE DECREE AND DENIED PERMANENT ALIMONY Read More »

WOMEN CAN NOT BE FORCED UNDER RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS , SAYS THE SUPREME COURT

The Supreme Court stated that a woman is not a chattel who can be forced to live with her husband. The court was hearing a case in which a man sought a court order compelling his wife to remarry him. A slave or a tangible item of property is referred to as a chattel. “What …

WOMEN CAN NOT BE FORCED UNDER RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS , SAYS THE SUPREME COURT Read More »

Pregnancy termination is permissible: if the victim ought to

Rape victim who gets pregnant must be told about her legal rights. There is section 3 of the medical termination of pregnancy act, of 1971 prohibits termination of pregnancy after 20 weeks. Bombay High Court allows 12-year-old rape victim to abort fetus, says forcing pregnancy will breach her fundamental rights . In continuation of this, …

Pregnancy termination is permissible: if the victim ought to Read More »

  Maintenance can be claimed from the father: a right

The maintenance of child is not a matter concerned with divorce of parents. The child can claim upbringing by father as entitled to him under section 20 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act,1956 . In the fitness of things, the Delhi High Court has been quit upfront to asset emphatically, elegantly and eloquently in …

  Maintenance can be claimed from the father: a right Read More »

Love affair’ irrelevant ground for bail when victim is a minor girl: supreme court in pocso case

On February 22, 2022, in the case of X (Minor) vs. the State of Jharkhand and Amr.  the Supreme Court revoked bail granted to an accused under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act 2012), stating that once the Court determines …

Love affair’ irrelevant ground for bail when victim is a minor girl: supreme court in pocso case Read More »

DISCLAMER:

This website has been designed only for the purposes of dissemination of basic information on RR Associates; information which is otherwise available on the internet, various public platforms and social media. Careful attention has been given to ensure that the information provided herein is accurate and up-to-date. However, RR Associates is not responsible for any reliance that a reader places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused due to any inaccuracy in or exclusion of any information, or its interpretation thereof. Reader is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources.

This website is not an attempt to advertise or solicit clients, and does not seek to create or invite any lawyer-client relationship. The links provided on this website are to facilitate access to basic information on RR Associates, and, to share the various thought leadership initiatives undertaken by it. The content herein or on such links should not be construed as a legal reference or legal advice. Readers are advised not to act on any information contained herein or on the links and should refer to legal counsels and experts in their respective jurisdictions for further information and to determine its impact.

RR Associates advises against the use of the communication platform provided on this website for exchange of any confidential, business or politically sensitive information. User is requested to use his or her judgment and exchange of any such information shall be solely at the user’s risk.