Adultery: then vs now

Adultery as mentioned under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code can be defined as ‘consensual sexual intercourse with the wife of another man without his consent or connivance,’ with up to 5 years of imprisonment, fine or both, it used to be entertained as a criminal offense.

Dating back to 1860, Enshrining the Patriarchal influence, the definition can be seen as more of a man-to-man dispute, neglecting the consent of the women and exempting them from the offense; Sec 198 (2) of the Code of the criminal procedure boosts the idea by allowing no person other than the husband of the woman deemed to be aggrieved.

With centuries of the Draconian law, the Supreme Court struck down section 497 on the plea of a non-resident Keralite, Joseph Shine challenging the Constitutionality of the act. However, it’s still preserved in pieces, narrowed into a ground of divorce. In a country like India, with stone rigid views against divorce, one can either sip down their unfaithful partner or get deserted by society. The societal disagreement gets tougher for women. For a housewife in a village with twice-in-day electricity, Divorce is crushing her future along with her child’s, ‘How could she not bear a husband not loyal to her?’ By decriminalizing Adultery we safeguarded the fundamental rights of equality and Prohibition of discrimination, it’s a step to an ideal society but we can’t ignore the brutality unleashed on women, with their husbands immunized against the fear of legal consequences to their disloyalty.

In the case of Nakkerran Alias Jeroan Pandy Vs State and Anr, cascading from nothing but reasonable doubts of Bigamy, Dowry and associated cruelty, the court stated that if an extramarital relationship of a man causes serious domestic discord between a married couple then he can be convicted of causing wife mental cruelty on his wife under sec 498 (A) of IPC, confirming the short term imprisonment of the accused. Relying upon the dictum in KV Prakash Babu Vs State of Karnataka, The court considered the abnormality of the facts and circumstances establishing an extramarital relationship with the adjacent episode of the wife being subject to mental torture and being forced to leave her matrimonial home.

Although the judgment would bring massive relaxation for women suffering from a toxic relationship, still it seems like we’re back to square one.

The verdict confines the term for the legal remedy around women leaving the scope for being challenged on the grounds of its constitutionality.

You may also like

Related Posts

DISCLAMER:

This website has been designed only for the purposes of dissemination of basic information on RR Associates; information which is otherwise available on the internet, various public platforms and social media. Careful attention has been given to ensure that the information provided herein is accurate and up-to-date. However, RR Associates is not responsible for any reliance that a reader places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused due to any inaccuracy in or exclusion of any information, or its interpretation thereof. Reader is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources.

This website is not an attempt to advertise or solicit clients, and does not seek to create or invite any lawyer-client relationship. The links provided on this website are to facilitate access to basic information on RR Associates, and, to share the various thought leadership initiatives undertaken by it. The content herein or on such links should not be construed as a legal reference or legal advice. Readers are advised not to act on any information contained herein or on the links and should refer to legal counsels and experts in their respective jurisdictions for further information and to determine its impact.

RR Associates advises against the use of the communication platform provided on this website for exchange of any confidential, business or politically sensitive information. User is requested to use his or her judgment and exchange of any such information shall be solely at the user’s risk.